FACTORS AFFECTING GROUP BEHAVIOUR
The success or failure of a group depends upon so many factors.
Group member resources, structure (group size, group roles, group norms, and
group cohesiveness), group processes (the communication, group decision making
processes, power dynamics, conflicting interactions, etc.) and group tasks
(complexity and interdependence).
1. Group Member Resources:
The members’ knowledge, abilities, skills; and
personality characteristics (sociability, self- reliance, and independence) are
the resources the group members bring in with them. The success depends upon
these resources as useful to the task.
2. Group Structure:
·
Group Size: Group size can vary from 2 people to a very large number of
people. Small groups of two to ten are thought to be more effective because
each member has ample opportunity to take part and engage actively in the
group. Large groups may waste time by deciding on processes and trying to
decide who should participate next. Evidence supports the notion that as the
size of the group increases, satisfaction increases up to a certain point.
Increasing the size of a group beyond 10-12 members’ results in decreased
satisfaction. It is increasingly difficult for members of large groups to
identify with one another and experience cohesion.
· Group Roles: In formal groups, roles are always predetermined and assigned to
members. Each role shall have specific responsibilities and duties. There are,
however, emergent roles that develop naturally to meet the needs of the groups.
These emergent roles will often substitute the assigned roles as individuals
begin to express themselves and become more assertive. Group roles can then be
classified into work roles, maintenance roles, and blocking roles.
ü Work roles are task-oriented activities that involve accomplishing
the group’s goals. They involve a variety of specific roles such as initiator,
informer, clarifier, summarizer, and reality tester.
ü Maintenance roles are social-emotional activities that help
members maintain their involvement in the group and raise their personal
commitment to the group. The maintenance roles are harmonizer, gatekeeper,
consensus tester, encourager, and compromiser.
ü Blocking roles are activities that disrupt the group. Blockers
will stubbornly resist the group’s ideas, disagree with group members for
personal reasons, and will have hidden agendas. They may take the form of
dominating discussions, verbally attacking other group members, and distracting
the group with trivial information or unnecessary humour. Often times the
blocking behaviour may not be intended as negative. Sometimes a member may
share a joke in order to break the tension, or may question a decision in order
to force group members to rethink the issue. The blocking roles are aggressor,
blocker, dominator, comedian, and avoidance behaviour.
· Group Norms: Norms define the acceptable standard or boundaries of acceptable
and unacceptable behaviour, shared by group members. They are typically created
in order to facilitate group survival, make behaviour more predictable, avoid
embarrassing situations, and express the values of the group. Each group will
create its own norms that might determine from the work performance to dress to
making comments in a meeting. Groups exert pressure on members to force them to
conform to the group’s standards and at times not to perform at higher levels.
The norms often reflect the level of commitment, motivation, and performance of
the group. The majority of the group must agree that the norms are appropriate
in order for the behaviour to be accepted. There must also be a shared
understanding that the group supports the norms. It should be noted, however,
that members might violate group norms from time to time. If the majority of
members do not adhere to the norms, then they will eventually change and will
no longer serve as a standard for evaluating behaviour. Group members who do
not conform to the norms will be punished by being excluded, ignored, or asked
to leave the group.
·
Group Cohesiveness: Cohesiveness refers to the bonding of group members or unity,
feelings of attraction for each other and desire to remain part of the group.
Many factors influence the amount of group cohesiveness – agreement on group
goals, frequency of interaction, personal attractiveness, inter-group
competition, favourable evaluation, etc. The more difficult it is to obtain
group membership the more cohesive the group will be. Groups also tend to
become cohesive when they are in intense competition with other groups or face
a serious external threat to survival. Smaller groups and those who spend
considerable time together also tend to be more cohesive.
3. Group Processes:
Decision-making by a group is superior, because group generates
more information and knowledge, generates diverse alternatives, increases
acceptance of a solution, and increases legitimacy. Decisions take longer time,
minority is dominated, pressure is applied to conform to group decisions, and
none is responsible for the decisions. Group processes also include
communication, conflict management, and leadership.
§ Communication: Communication in small groups is interpersonal communication within groups of between 3 and 20 individuals. Groups generally work in a
context that is both relational and social. Quality
communication such as helping behaviors and information-sharing causes groups
to be superior to the average individual in terms of the quality of decisions
and effectiveness of decisions made or actions taken. However, quality decision-making
requires that members both identify with the group and have an attitude of
commitment to participation in interaction.
§ Conflict management: Conflict management is the process of limiting the negative aspects of conflict while increasing the positive aspects of conflict. The aim of
conflict management is to enhance learning and group outcomes, including effectiveness or performance in
organizational setting. Properly managed conflict can improve group outcomes.
§ Leadership: A
good leader has a clear picture of future results and aligns organizational
strategy with this vision. A leader must be intimately familiar with the end
destination. Therefore, leadership also influence the formation of group
behaviours.
4. Group Tasks:
·
Complexity: A factor involved in a complicated process or
situation in the group task. Group behavior is too formed based on the
situation and complexity of task.
·
Interdependence: Interdependence is the mutual dependence
between two or more groups. In relationships, interdependence is the degree to which members of the
group are mutually dependent on the others. This concept differs from a
dependent relationship, where some members are dependent and some are not.
Sometimes group behavior is formed based on the interdependence of group
members.
CAUSES OF POOR GROUP DYNAMICS
Group leaders and team members can contribute to a negative group
dynamic. Let's look at some of the most common problems that can occur:
§ Weak leadership: when a team
lacks a strong leader, a more dominant member of the group can often take
charge. This can lead to a lack of direction, infighting, or a focus on the
wrong priorities.
§ Excessive deference to authority: This can happen when people want to be seen to agree with a
leader, and therefore hold back from expressing their own opinions.
§ Blocking: this happens when team
members behave in a way that disrupts the flow of information in the group.
People can adopt blocking roles such as:
§ The aggressor: this person often
disagrees with others, or is inappropriately outspoken.
ü The negator: this group member is often
critical of others' ideas.
ü The withdrawer: this person doesn't
participate in the discussion.
ü The recognition seeker: this group member is boastful, or dominates the session.
ü The joker: this person introduces
humor at inappropriate times.
§ Group think: this
happens when people place a desire for consensus above their desire to reach
the right decision. This prevents people from fully exploring alternative
solutions.
§ Free riding: here, some group members
take it easy, and leave their colleagues to do all the work. Free riders may
work hard on their own, but limit their contributions in group situations; this
is known as "social loafing."
§ Evaluation apprehension: team
members' perceptions can also create a negative group dynamic. Evaluation
apprehension happens when people feel that they are being judged excessively
harshly by other group members, and they hold back their opinions as a result.
EDUCATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE OF
GROUP DYNAMICS /
IMPORTANCE OF GROUP DYNAMICS IN
EDUCATION
According to A.I. Gates, Group
Dynamics offers the best means available for the development of social skills
essential of democratic living, better social understanding and preparing the
individual members of the group for democratic citizenship.
§
The aim of using Group Dynamic in schools as an educational methods is
neither to produce leaders not to find ways in which a person can get work done
by a group. Its purpose is to promote, democratic activities.
§
In schools we find qualitative as well as quantitative individual
differences in the abilities of persons present in a class. If every member
takes active part in the activities of the group, the total work done by a
group is more than the sum of the work done by them individually. (For this reason only, John Deway advocated
the ‘Project method’ of teaching in
schools).
§
Apart from intelligence and metal health of children prevalence of
satisfying social climate in the classroom contributes to effective learning
and maximum attainment. By making the students to function in small groups,
sympathy for others and sense of ‘we-feeling’ will get increased among pupils,
which ultimately lead to conducive social climate in the classroom.
§
At the beginning the school appears to be a gathering of a crowd. Each
student is unfamiliar to every other student. Also there may not be much
interaction between the pupils and teachers. Headmaster, teachers and parents
should ensure mutual cooperation among themselves to promote the cooperative
spirit among the pupils, leading to the emergence of school as a democratic
community.
§
Inter-school competitions in sports and games, academics and
co-curricular fields promote the feeling of solidarity among the pupils of
respective schools participating in such competitions.
§
Tone and tradition of the school helps to establish effective community
life in the school.
§
To give training for effective leadership to pupils and to develop
democratic climate in the classrooms, provision should be made available to
impart citizenship training and self-governance through various planned
programmes.
§
Students and teachers should have clear cut ideas about the objectives
and goals of the school so as to change the school into an ideal community.
Beginning the school work every day with morning assembly, participation by all
in different school functions and celebrations, common school uniform, school
prayer etc. provide opportunities to develop the feeling of solidarity in the
school.
§
Order and discipline are essential for effective functioning of any
school. Though individualized instruction techniques could be employed for cognitive
development of children, group dynamics should be profitably used to develop
social skills and social maturity in children.
§
In forming teams for discharging responsibilities like keeping the campus
clean, brining out school magazine, participating in inter-school competitions
etc. abilities and interests of individual students should be kept in mind.
Then only all in the group will realize their respective roles and act
collectively as a group with high morale and cohesion.